Skip to main content
Log in

CAN RATIONAL-EMOTIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY (REBT) AND ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY (ACT) RESOLVE THEIR DIFFERENCES AND BE INTEGRATED?

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) is a pioneering form of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is part of the new wave of CBTs. In this article, I discuss the papers of Ciarrochi, Robb, and Godsell, and of Ciarrochi and Robb, who propose that REBT and ACT can be quite suitably integrated, and the paper of Steven Hayes, the originator of ACT and of Relational Frame Theory, who is skeptical about the feasibility of Ciarrochi, Robb, and Godsell’s proposals. My own view is that ACT and REBT significantly overlap in their theory and practice and that they can be successfully integrated if both therapies make some changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler A., (1964). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. Capricorn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York:.

  • Ciarrochi, J., Robb, H., & Godsell, C. (2005). Letting a little nonverbal air into the room. Insights for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Part 1: Philosophical and theoretical underpinnings. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23.

  • Ciarrochi, J., & Robb, H. (2005). Letting a little nonverbal air into the room. Insights from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Part 2: Applications. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23.

  • DiGiuseppe R. A., Muran J. C. (1992). The use of metaphor in rational-emotive psychotherapy Psychotherapy in Private Practice 10:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Terjesen, M., Rose, R., Doyle, K., & Vidalakis, N. (1998). Selective abstraction errors in reviewing REBT outcome studies: A review of reviews. Poster presented at the 106th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA

  • Ellis A. (1957). Outcome of employing three techniques of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 13:344–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Citadel, Secaucus, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (1976). The biological basis of human irrationality Journal of Individual Psychology 32: 145–168 Reprinted, New York: Albert Ellis Institute

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Kensington Publishers, New York Revised and updated

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2001a). Feeling better, getting better, and staying better. Impact Publishers, Atascadero, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2001b). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2002). Overcoming resistance: A rational emotive behavior therapy integrative approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2003). Anger: Hot to live with and without it. Citadel Press, New York (Rev)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2004a). Rational emotive behavior therapy: It works for me—It can work for you. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. (2004b). Similarities and differences between rational emotive behavior therapy and cognitive therapy Journal of Cognitive Therapy 17:225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., Harper R. A. (1961). A guide to rational living. Melvin Powers/Wilshire Books, North Hollywood, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (2005). Stability and change in cognitive behavior therapy: Considering the implications of ACT and REBT. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23.

  • Hayes, S., Follette, V., & Linehan, M. (2005). Mindfulness, acceptance, and relationship. Expanding the cognitive behavior tradition. New York: Guilford Press

  • Hayes S. C., Strosahl K., Wilson K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson N. S., (1992). Behavioral couple therapy: A new beginning Behavior Therapy 23:491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics, Concord, CA: International Society For General Semantics.

  • Linehan M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons L. C., Woods P. J. (1991). The efficacy of rational-emotive therapy: A quantitative review of the outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review 11: 357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padesky C. A., Beck A. T., (2004). Science and philosophy: Comparison of cognitive therapy and rational emotive behavior therapy Journal of Cognitive Therapy 17: 211–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Ellis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellis, A. CAN RATIONAL-EMOTIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY (REBT) AND ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY (ACT) RESOLVE THEIR DIFFERENCES AND BE INTEGRATED?. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 23, 153–168 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0008-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0008-8

Keywords

Navigation